Discussions about anything related to conspiracy
« Back to the Diorbhorguil’s Group Forum
Conspiracy Theories
7 Replies

Reply by Dio :3
posted
there’s a conspiracy theory that the smolensk tragedy was a deliberate attack. all evidence points against it but one of the main political parties (Law and Justice (PiS)) in poland keeps insisting that it was actually a terrorist attack. probably because the president of poland that was in the plane was the brother of the leader of PiS.
there have been countless investigations, and none of them say anything about a possible terrorist attack, but they’re still defying the results of said investigations.
Reply by Dio
posted
Reply by Dio :3
posted
Reply by Dio
posted
Reply by Zirum
posted
heres my conspiracy theory i believe in (sorta conspiracy not really because you can literally look up the evidence) blackrock and vanguard are the two top huge monopolies and own hundreds of brands through shares, such huge chunks of shares they can dictate how they sell and what they sell and can make important changes to their ingredients and everything about them. they influence a lot of stocks as well, and what i know of from them as well they took advantage of the ukraine vs russia war and took both sides but tldr helped destroy ukraine by offering russia more and more weapons (putting them in debt to repay) and then offered to give loans out to the government out to "repair" it, so the ukrainian government is in debt to blackrock underneath them nearly permanently. it involves a lot of stuff about agriculture and majorly their wheat supplies, energy, infrastructure and everything else ukraine has struggled for. blackrock and vanguard are trying to control as much as possible, even going as far as trying to get into a deathgrip around entire countries throats.
Reply by Zirum
posted
another conspiracy theory (NOT a conspiracy theory this also has evidence you can research yourself) the us had an issue with drones flying everywhere that seemed like it appeared out of nowhere, going into peoples personal properties and even right up to their windows, and there was even a government announcement not to interact or interfere with these drones but they refused to comment on if the drones were owned by the us government (until later), even hinting that the drones were from another enemy country spying to get the citizens off their back, which set off a lot of alarm to people. because why would you just ignore a drone illegally spying on you? and why would you NOT try to knock it out of the sky? the government pretended to make everyone believe they were trying to figure out the "drone situation" while at the same time STRESSING over how no citizen should try to prevent the drones from continuing illegally spying and going through peoples properties. eventually the government did say it was theirs and my assumption is they were trying to find some big threat without alerting the public but imo the way they went through with it was terrible and hardly convincing. everyone knew the government was hiding something and the majority of people already believed it was the governments doing, which made them want to destroy those drones even more.
Reply by Dio
posted